Agicap publishes no pricing. My 2026 analysis of SMB treasury software: how it works, real limits, and cheaper alternatives.
Agicap is a French cash flow management tool built for SMBs and mid-market companies juggling multiple bank accounts, multiple entities, and sometimes multiple currencies. It aggregates balances in real time, builds a rolling forecast, and tracks both customer collections and vendor payments. The product is solid, and banking and ERP connectivity ranks among the broadest on the French market. Its major flaw fits in one sentence: no pricing is published anywhere—you only find out what it costs after a sales call. The full profile is here: Agicap.
Agicap is cash flow management software that centralizes your bank accounts and transforms your real cash flows into a workable daily forecast.
The editor is a French SAS company based in Lyon, founded in 2016, currently employing between 500 and 1,000 people. The original positioning was narrow and clear: give SMB leaders a view of their cash flow other than a spreadsheet updated Friday evening. Since then, the platform has expanded into four distinct areas: treasury itself, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and payment execution, all groupable into a house package called Treasury Suite.
Important point to avoid the most common misunderstanding: Agicap is not accounting software. It doesn't keep your books, doesn't produce your tax filing, and doesn't replace your accountant. It plugs into your accounting or ERP to read the data and project it forward. If you're looking for the first piece rather than the second, look instead at Pennylane or Tiime, and read my detailed Pennylane review.
The difference from a spreadsheet is real. An Excel file will never tell you that the customer wire transfer expected Tuesday still hasn't arrived Thursday. Agicap will.
You connect your banks and accounting tool, the platform aggregates the flows, then you adjust a forecast that automatically recalibrates with each new transaction.
Bank connections run through DSP2-compliant aggregators—the European payment services directive that opened access to account data. On the systems management side, the list of native connectors is genuinely generous for a French editor: SAP S/4 HANA and Business One, Oracle NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage Intacct and Sage X3, Odoo, plus Xero and QuickBooks for smaller setups. Online collections also feed in via Stripe, PayPal, Adyen, or Payplug. And when none of that fits, there's still Excel and Google Sheets import, plus an API and SFTP.
This breadth of connectivity is the product's real selling point. A cash flow forecast is only as good as the freshness of its inputs. A tool that forces you to manually reimport a bank statement every Monday won't last three months in a finance team.
Daily work looks like this: you see the consolidated balance across all your entities, you compare actual to forecast, you adjust delayed collections, you simulate a scenario by changing a hiring or payment-term assumption. Decisions come from there. A genuinely maintained mobile app lets you check balances without opening your computer—rare in this tool category.
The payables module follows the same logic in reverse. Incoming invoices are centralized, routed through an approval circuit, then feed into the payment forecast before they're even paid. This chaining is what separates a treasury tool from a simple account aggregator: the invoice you just approved shows up in the curve, not just the day the money leaves.
No one can tell you in advance, and that's not a figure of speech: Agicap publishes no amounts anywhere, on any page.
I've collected pricing grids from several hundred tools for this directory. Agicap is part of a small handful where I closed the tab without a single number. The official pricing page lists the commercialized modules—cash management, banking and ERP connectivity, spend and vendor management, payments, accounts receivable management—then offers a "Try free" button. Not a euro shown, no range, no tiers.
What goes through the quote: the price of each module, number of users, number of legal entities, number of bank connections, and contract length. In other words, nearly everything that determines the invoice.
You'll find amounts ranging from €99 to €799 per month on comparison sites. Don't take them as gospel. These figures come from third-party sources that contradict each other, none confirmed by the editor, and they often date to a product version that no longer exists. Multiple sources also consistently report a twelve-month commitment, but again, Agicap doesn't document it publicly.
My position is clear: pricing opacity is a perfectly legitimate commercial choice in the mid-market, and a real friction point when you're a 30-person SMB that just wants to know if the tool fits the budget before committing two hours to a demo. A free trial exists, but its duration and terms aren't documented either.
Since price is negotiable, show up to the sales meeting prepared and get each line quoted separately rather than a single bundle.
Here's the list I use to frame this kind of conversation. Copy it, email it before the demo, and ask for written answers.
Question checklist to send before the demo
- What is the annual price for the core treasury module alone, with no add-on modules?
- What is the price of each add-on module, line by line?
- How many users are included, and what does each additional user cost?
- How many legal entities and bank connections are included?
- What is the minimum contract length, and what are the exit conditions?
- Is the pricing indexed, and by how much at renewal?
- Are setup and onboarding fees charged separately?
- Are my banks on the list of supported connections, specifically named?
- What happens if a bank connection drops, and how long to restore?
- In what format can I export my data if I leave?
The last two questions aren't decorative. They address the two pain points after you sign.
The product's strength lies in combining broad bank consolidation with functional scope that goes beyond simple cash forecasting.
The multi-horizon forecast is well-executed, with near-term driven by real collections and payments and medium-term fed by the company's assumptions. Multi-entity and multi-currency are native, not bolted on, which is exactly what a group with three subsidiaries and a sterling account needs.
Accounts receivable deserves mention. Chasing unpaid invoices is the highest-return and least-exploited treasury lever in French SMBs. The latest Payment Terms Observatory report pegged the average delay at 13.6 days at end of 2024 and estimated that eliminating these delays would return roughly €15 billion in cash to SMBs. Automating follow-up often beats negotiating an overdraft.
On security, the file is clean. The editor documents ISO 27001:2022 certification obtained in 2024, hosting on Google Cloud data centers in Belgium, TLS 1.2 or higher encryption in transit and AES-256 at rest. For a tool seeing all your bank flows, this level of rigor is the minimum and it's maintained.
Two complaints emerge consistently: pricing opacity and occasional fragility in bank connections.
On price, I said what I think above. I'll add a practical point: the twelve-month commitment, if confirmed in your contract, turns a bad choice into an expensive one. You won't test Agicap for three months to see.
On bank connections, several users report frequent reauthorizations. It's not unique to Agicap—it's a direct consequence of the DSP2 framework, which requires periodic reauthentication of account access. But when you have eight banks and four entities, the chore becomes real and falls on someone in the finance team.
The third point is more strategic. The product's scope expands fast, from treasury to payments to payables. This expansion makes comparison with competitors harder and mechanically pushes the average deal size up. Verify you're paying for what you actually use, not a suite where you'll activate a quarter.
Finally, pricing is still seen as high for a small operation. A company with fewer than ten employees and a single bank account has no need for this tool and generally knows it after the first demo.
Agicap justifies itself when your cash flow complexity exceeds what a spreadsheet can honestly track, and not before.
| Profile | Verdict |
|---|---|
| SMB or mid-market, multiple bank accounts | Relevant, that's the target |
| Multi-entity group or multi-currency | Relevant, the product's strength |
| CFO or dedicated treasurer on staff | Relevant, the tool finds its user |
| Micro-business, single account, under ten employees | Oversized |
| Solo freelancer | Out of scope, an accounting tool is enough |
| You want to compare pricing without a call | Impossible, move on |
The real decision criterion isn't your revenue; it's the number of cash sources you have to reconcile. Two bank accounts and regular billing work fine another way. Six accounts, three subsidiaries, and customer payments at sixty days, no.
Module details, integrations, and verdict are recorded on the Agicap profile in the directory, which I update whenever there's a notable editor change.
A second, less obvious criterion: who will use it. Treasury software doesn't run itself; it requires someone to update assumptions, arbitrate discrepancies, and keep the forecast alive. If no one on the team has the time or the reflex, the tool becomes a dormant subscription after two months. I've seen this scenario more often than the opposite, and it has nothing to do with product quality.
There's no strict Agicap equivalent in this directory, so the right approach is to break the need down and address each piece with the right tool.
For daily SMB cash management, the business account does a lot already. Qonto gives a clear view of flows, spending categories, and team cards, and Shine covers the same ground on smaller structures. It's not cash forecasting, but for a single-account company, it's often enough.
To connect accounting and financial visibility, Pennylane remains the French-language reference, with bank sync and a management-focused dashboard. The Pennylane vs. Qonto comparison details where the boundary falls.
To tackle receivables without buying a full suite, Sellsy handles invoicing and follow-up in one flow, and Axonaut does the same across a broader micro-to-SMB scope, including quotes. My Sellsy review covers its real pricing and limits.
For reporting, a dataviz tool like Power BI or Looker Studio plugged into your bank exports builds a solid cash dashboard for marginal cost. It's more hands-on, takes half a day to set up and a monthly export routine, and costs far less.
For a solo freelancer, the question doesn't arise. Indy covers accounting, filings, and cash tracking for a fraction of the price, and I detail it in my Indy review.
Last scenario: a group needing to consolidate without buying a full suite. Joiin aggregates multiple account sets and outputs clean multi-entity reporting. Combined with regular bank exports, it covers much of what you'd seek from Agicap, with less automation and far less invoice. The choice then hinges on how much hands-on manipulation per month you're willing to accept.